In this week’s episode of Equity, Haje Jan Kamps and Mary Ann Azevedo delve into the recent decision by fintech company Brex to abandon its co-CEO model. Founded in 2017 by Pedro Franceschi and Henrique Dubugras, Brex initially thrived under the co-CEO structure, with Franceschi focusing on internal operations and Dubugras on external relations.
The Co-CEO Model: A Double-Edged Sword
Initially, the co-CEO model seemed to work well for Brex. However, as the company grew, this setup began to slow decision-making. This was a critical issue that needed addressing, especially when considering the potential IPO on the horizon.
The Decision to Abandon Co-CEOs
In response to these challenges, Brex decided to adopt a single-CEO model. Pedro Franceschi will now lead as CEO, while Henrique Dubugras will take on the role of chairman of the board.
Challenges Faced by Co-CEOs
Haje and Mary Ann highlighted some of the broader challenges that companies might face with two CEOs:
- Decision-making: With two CEOs, decision-making can become a bottleneck. This is particularly true when there are differing opinions on critical issues.
- Conflicting priorities: When both CEOs have different areas of focus, it can lead to conflicting priorities and confusion within the organization.
- Investor appeal: Companies with multiple CEOs might find it challenging to attract investors who prefer a clear chain of command.
Other Companies That Have Adopted or Abandoned Co-CEO Models
Brex’s decision is not unique. Other companies have also experimented with co-CEOs, often with varying degrees of success. For instance:
- Airbnb: Founded by Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia, Airbnb initially had a co-CEO structure but later shifted to a single CEO model.
- Uber: When Travis Kalanick stepped down as CEO in 2017, the company had multiple CEOs for a brief period before Dara Khosrowshahi took over.
Why Co-CEOs Might Not Be Suitable for All Companies
While co-CEOs can bring diverse perspectives and experiences to the table, they are not always the best fit for every organization. Some potential drawbacks include:
- Overemphasis on consensus: When both CEOs need to agree on decisions, it can lead to an overemphasis on reaching consensus rather than making timely decisions.
- Lack of clear leadership: Without a clear chain of command, decision-making can become murky, and employees may struggle to understand who is responsible for what.
Conclusion
The co-CEO model has its benefits, but it’s not suitable for every company. Brex’s decision to abandon this structure highlights the importance of adapting to changing circumstances and prioritizing agility in a rapidly evolving market.
Equity Podcast: A Platform for In-Depth Discussions
Equity is TechCrunch’s flagship podcast, produced by Theresa Loconsolo, and released on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The podcast covers a wide range of topics related to startups, venture capital, and the tech industry.
Subscribe to Equity Podcast
To stay up-to-date with the latest episodes and discussions, subscribe to Equity on:
Follow Equity on Social Media
Stay connected with the Equity team on social media:
Full Episode Transcript and Archive
For those who prefer reading over listening, check out the full episode transcript on Simplecast.
